Revenue sought condonation of a 104-day delay in filing an income tax appeal. The court found sufficient cause shown and no written opposition from the respondent, and allowed the application, directing removal of office objections within eight weeks.
Delay of 104 days in filing the appeal condoned in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
705-IA-565-2024 (OS).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 565 OF 2024 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(IT)(ST) NO. 32314 OF 2022
Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 4
...Applicant
Versus
Pranav Sunil Gandhi
...Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar i/b Mohinee Chougule for Applicant. Ms. Manvi Chaturvedi i/b Nishith Desai Associates for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. Date: 11 DECEMBER, 2024.
P.C.
Manvi Chaturvedi learned counsel for the respondent.
failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)
(G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Mayur Adane
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 104-day delay in filing the income tax appeal under Section 260A should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 4
Pranav Sunil Gandhi
G. S. Kulkarni
Advait M. Sethna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
