This interim application against the conviction order under Section 494 IPC allowing condonation of the 143-day delay in filing the appeal was allowed.
Interim application is allowed and delay is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
52(1) IA-4802-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by HUSENBASHARAHAMANNADAF HUSENBASHARAHAMANNADAFDate: 2024.11.28 10:21:56 +0530
INTERIM APPLICATION No.4801 OF 2024 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 23580 OF 2024
Sherbanu Khan @ Jayda Babu Khan ...Applicant Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Vikrant V. Phatade, for Applicant. Ms. R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent/State.
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 27th NOVEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Husen
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay of 143 days in filing the criminal appeal.
Whether the order of conviction for the offence punishable under Section 494 IPC under challenge in this appeal be accepted.
Sherbanu Khan
State Of Maharashtra
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
