The High Court of Bombay, in an interim application filed by the appellant challenging an order directing the vacating of a structure, refused further time extension. The Court noted that previous orders mandated immediate vacating based on TAC reports.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
905-ia-467.24.doc
BIPIN DHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2024.01.12 18:23:24 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 467 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 706 OF 2022
Munshi Bhavan Welfare Association Mumbai Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr.
… Appellant
… Respondents
Mr. Jash B. Vyas for the Appellant.
Ms. Smita V. Tondwalkar for Respondent No.1/MCGM.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 12 JANUARY 2024
P.C. :-
. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be granted to vacate the structure given previous directions.
Munshi Bhavan Welfare Association Mumbai
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
R. N. LADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
