Rushikesh @ Gatalu Fakira Donde v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The interim bail applicant did not wish to press the application. The High Court disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-IA-4645-24+BA.DOC
Sayali Upasani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4645 OF 2024
IN
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2339 OF 2024
Rushikesh @ Gatalu Fakira Donde ...Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Pratik P. Pawar, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Gauri Rao , APP for State-Respondent.
CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATED:- 19th NOVEMBER, 2024
PC:-
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]
1/1
Rushikesh @ Gatalu Fakira Donde
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court