Bail application withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after eight months if there is no substantial progress in the trial; the interim application did not survive and was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3668 OF 2023
Krushna alias Amol Angad Pandhare .Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4641 OF 2023 IN
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3668 OF 2023
Rajendra Hanmant Pawar .Intervenor
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Krushna alias Amol Angad Pandhare .Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.Respondent
Mr. Tejas Hilage, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. Rahul B. Vijaymane, Advocate, for the Intervenor Mr. Shriram S. Chaudhari, APP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Gajanan J. Karnewad, PSI, Mohol Police Station, Solapur present
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 13.02.2024
P. C.
inclined to grant bail to the Applicant, Mr. Hilage, learned
counsel appearing for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave
1
Anand
to withdraw the Bail Application with liberty to fle a fresh Bail Application after a period of eight months, if there is no substantial progress in the trial. Leave granted.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
2
Krushna alias Amol Angad Pandhare
The State of Maharashtra
Rajendra Hanmant Pawar
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
