Disposed

Pradip Lamuel Kamble v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC14 Oct 2024IA/4187/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted interim relief in an anticipatory bail application, noting the dispute appears civil and investigation is largely documentary. The applicant was directed to cooperate with the investigation and furnish bonds, with the application listed for further consideration.

What did the court decide?

Interim release on bail on furnishing PR Bond of ₹50,000/- and sureties, subject to cooperation with investigation and not tampering with evidence.

Pradip Lamuel Kamble vs State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

510.ABA.2776.2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2776 OF 2024

¶4

Ajay Pramod Shrivastav

¶5

...Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI

¶8

Digitally signed by SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI Date: 2024.10.14 18:57:00 +0530

¶9

The State of Maharashtra

¶10

...Respondent

¶11

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.21249 OF 2024

¶12

¶13

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2776 OF 2024

¶14

***

¶15

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi (Through V.C.) a/w Ms. Shivani Kondekar, for Applicant.

¶16

Mr. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent.

¶17

Mr. Chetan Damree, for Applicant in IAST/21249/2024.

¶18

 Mr. S.Y. Patil, API, Mumbai Naka Police Station, Nashik.

¶19

¶20

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 14^th OCTOBER, 2024.

¶21

P. C. :

¶22

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for

¶23

the respondent – State, as also the learned counsel appearing for the first informant (Intervenor), who has filed an application for intervention.

¶24

On 25.09.2024, this Court passed an interim order in

¶25

Anticipatory Bail Application No.2591 of 2024, in favour of the co-accused person and his application is now listed for further consideration on 24.10.2024, to be included in the supplementary list.

¶26

In the said order, this Court recorded in paragraph No.9 as

¶27

Page1 of 4

¶28

Shrikant Malani

¶29

510.ABA.2776.2024.doc

¶30

follows :

¶31

“9. The documents on record indeed show that disputes between the aforesaid two parties are pending, including a number of proceedings before either the Civil Court or competent authorities. Prima facie, it appears that both the parties are raising rival claims to properties in and around Nashik. Such pending proceedings further indicate that the nature of dispute could be said to be of civil nature and it will have to be examined as to whether criminality can be foisted on the applicant in the present case. It is also evident from the nature of allegations that the evidence would be documentary. In fact, in the order dated 4^th September 2024, whereby the Sessions Court granted relief of anticipatory bail to the co-accused licensee, it is recorded that most of the documents pertaining to the investigation are in the custody of the concerned authority. Nothing prevents the Investigating Officer to proceed to take possession of such documents, in order to undertake effective investigation. Hence, interim order deserves to be granted in the present application.”

¶32

There is substance in the contention raised on behalf of the applicant in this application that the above quoted reasons should inure to the benefit of the applicant also while pressing for interim relief.

¶33

Hence, this Court is inclined to grant interim relief pending

¶34

Page2 of 4

¶35

Shrikant Malani

¶36

510.ABA.2776.2024.doc

¶37

consideration of his application.

¶38

In view of the above, the following interim order is passed.

¶39

(A) Till the next date, in the event the applicant is arrested in connection with FIR No.0220 of 2024, dated 26^th July, 2024, registered at Mumbai Naka Police Station, District Nashik, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR Bond of 50,000/- and one or two sureties in the like amount.₹

¶40

(B) The applicant shall remain present before the Investigating Officer on 21^st October, 2024 and 22^nd October, 2024, between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon and thereafter, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The applicant shall cooperate with the investigation.

¶41

(C) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶42

In the event, the applicant violates any of the aforesaid conditions, the order passed today would be recalled.

¶43

Needless to say, observations made in the present order are limited to considering the question of granting interim relief in the present

¶44

Page3 of 4

¶45

Shrikant Malani

¶46

510.ABA.2776.2024.doc

¶47

application.

¶48

List this application for further consideration on 24^th October,

¶49

2024, to be included in the “Supplementary List.” Tagged with Anticipatory Bail Application No.2591 of 2024

¶50

(MANISH PITALE, J.)

¶51

Page4 of 4

¶52

Shrikant Malani

Pradip Lamuel Kamble v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradip Lamuel Kamble v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dipl Ingenieure Rainer and Oliver Puls Gmbh Germany vs Force Motors Limited India

Ricardo Construction Private Limited vs Yusuf K Dohadwalla and 2 Ors.

Ricardo Construction Private Limited vs Yusuf K. Dohadwalla

Adilkhan Gafarkhan vs the State of Maharashtra

Mujahid Mohammed Isaa Shaikh vs Deputy Collector (Special Desk)

Jerry Varghese International Ltd. vs Mathew Yohannan and Anr.