Majid Latif Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.REVN.314.2022.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2022
Anisa Akbar Ansari .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4061 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2022
Majid Latif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
- Mr. Amrut A. Joshi i./by Mr. Shashank Mishra, Advocate for Applicant.
- Mr. Chandrakant D. Mali, APP for Respondent No.1 - State of Maharashtra.
- Mr. Umar Dalvi i./by Mr. Rajendra Rathod, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anisa Akbar Ansari
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- applicant
Majid Latif Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court