This court allowed an interim application for condonation of delay in filing a second appeal, finding sufficient cause based on uncontroverted averments.
The interim application was allowed; the delay in filing the second appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by ANANT ANANTKRISHNA KRISHNANAIKDate: NAIK 2024.02.17 16:14:15 +0530
1/1
18.IA.3830.2021 .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3830 OF 2021
IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 4796 OF 2020
Vilas Ramchandra Borade
...Applicant
vs.
Ganapat Ramchandra Borade & Ors.
...Respondents
Adv. Ashish Srivastava i/b. Adv. Kuldeep S. Patil for Applicant
Adv. Gurudas Gonwadkar for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6
CORAM :M. M. SATHAYE, J.
DATED :16th FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This is an Application for condonation of delay of 5 days in filing the
above Second Appeal. The Respondents are served and represented through
lawyer. No Reply is filed.
3. Considering the extent of delay and uncontroverted averments in the
Application, sufficient cause is made out. The Interim Application is allowed in
terms of prayer clause (a). Delay is condoned.
4. Learned Counsel for the Applicant/Appellant is directed to serve the copy
of the Appeal alongwith pending Application/s on the other side.
1/1
akn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause exists to condone a delay of five days in filing the second appeal.
Vilas Ramchandra Borade
Ganapat Ramchandra Borade & Ors.
M. M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court