Interim application seeking permission for substituted service by newspaper publication on respondents 6 and 7 in a writ petition. The Additional Public Prosecutor stated he would appear for those respondents, rendering the application unnecessary; it was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH RUSHIKESH VISHNU VISHNU PATIL PATIL Date: 2024.03.21 12:03:37 +0530
21 IA.348.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 348 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4518 OF 2019
Firoz Shaikh….Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.….Respondents
Mr. Ghanshyam Upadhyay a/w Mr. Vijay Jha i/b Law Juris, for the
Applicant.
Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, Addl.P.P., for the Respondent – State.
Ms. Krupali Borse, API, Kalyan Control Room, present.
CORAM :REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE:15th MARCH 2024.
P.C.:
1. By this application, the applicant seeks permission to effect
service by publication in a newspaper upon the Respondent Nos. 6
and 7.
2.Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, learned Addl.P.P., on instructions,
states that he would be appearing for the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7.
In view of the statement made by Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, learned
R. V. Patil
1/2
21 IA.348.2024.odt
Addl.P.P., the Interim Application does not survive and the same
stands disposed of.
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
R. V. Patil
2/2
Firoz Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court