M S Roadlines v. Income Tax Officer Wd 28(2)(2)
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in an income tax appeal was adjourned due to paucity of time, with earlier interim or ad-interim relief continuing until the next hearing date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3436 OF 2024 In
INCOME TAX APPEAL(IT) STAMP NO. 4181 OF 2020
M S Roadlines ....PETITIONER
V/S
Income Tax Officer Wd 28(2)(2) ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI & HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ DATE : 27th November, 2024
P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 04/12/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M S Roadlines
- respondent
Income Tax Officer Wd 28(2)(2)
Coram
G. S. Kulkarni
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Charity Fund vs Income Tax Officer (Exemption) 2, Ward 2(3), Mumbai
Heriminio India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors.
Royal Engineering Works vs Income Tax Officer Ward 28(2)(1) and Ors.
Jsw Steel Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central Circle) 8 (3), Mumbai and Ors.