SingleJudge modified a prior bail order allowing the applicant to furnish solvent sureties instead of local sureties after a month's delay in securing the latter. Application disposed.
Clause (b) of the bail order dated 22.12.2023 modified to require solvent sureties instead of local sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909-ia-290-2024.doc
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.290 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.4122 OF 2023
Niraj Kumar Gupteshwarlal Srivastav ...Applicant vs.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.Tohid Shaikh i/b. Ms. Anjali Patil, for the Applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP, for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 01, 2024
P.C.:
on 22nd December, 2023. Clause (b) of the order reads as under:-
Vishal Parekar
...1
909-ia-290-2024.doc
(b) The applicant-Niraj Kumar Gupteshwarlal Srivastav in connection with C.R. No. 454 of 2022 registered with Aarey police station shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount.
Application disposed.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Vishal Parekar
...2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can modify the bail order to permit solvent sureties in lieu of local sureties.
Whether the time elapsed since the initial bail order justifies relaxing the surety requirement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Niraj Kumar Gupteshwarlal Srivastav
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
