Tulsiram Dhanaji Aahire v. Sushila Subhash Sabale and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Criminal Revision Application 575/2017 (suspended to next date) and Interim Application 2825/2022, the Bombay High Court directed the applicant to deposit an additional Rs. 2 Lakhs towards the fine and compensation under Section 148(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act within four weeks.
What did the court decide?
Directed applicant to deposit Rs. 2 Lakhs via Court of J.M.F.C., Nashik within four weeks; refused complaint's prayer for the remaining Rs. 5,50,000.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA PALLAVI WARGAONKAR MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2024.01.23 11:08:08 +0530
14-IA-2825-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.575 OF 2017
Sushila Subhash Sabale
...Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2825 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.575 OF 2017
Tulsiram Dhanaji Aahire ...Applicant In the matter between Sushila Subhash Sabale ...Applicant
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Revisional Court can issue directions to deposit a further amount under Section 148(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the case was reserved for sentencing and not yet admitted in r
Whether the power to direct deposit of compensation lies with the Revisional Court or is restricted to the Appellate Court under Section 148(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sushila Subhash Sabale
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
S. M. Modak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court