Applicant sought, through the Legal Services Authority, condonation of a 90-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. The court found the reasons set out in the application sufficient and condoned the delay.
Delay of 90 days in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6a. IA 2602-2024.doc
Digitally signed by RUPALI RUPALI RAJESH RAJESH WAKODIKAR WAKODIKAR Date: 2024.07.12 16:29:17 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2602 OF 2024
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 13945 OF 2024
Mutthu Aarmugam Nadar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Jitendra Jagtap for the Applicant.
Ms. Gauri S. Rao, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ. DATE : 11th JULY, 2024
P.C. :
Authority, the Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 90 days, caused in filing the aforesaid Appeal.
1/2
Wakodikar
6a. IA 2602-2024.doc
application, application is allowed and delay of 90 days, caused in filing the aforesaid Appeal, is condoned.
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
Wakodikar
1 issue framed by the court
Should the 90-day delay in filing Criminal Appeal (ST) No. 13945 of 2024 be condoned?
Mutthu Aarmugam Nadar
The State of Maharashtra
REVATI MOHITE DERE
SHYAM C. CHANDAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
