Bhushan Ramchandra Satam v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:347
PMB 902.ia-25-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2024 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2270 OF 2022 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.618 OF 2022
BHUSHAN RAMCHANDRA SATAM ..APPLICANT VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
Adv. Sarthak P. Shetty for the applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 5, 2024
P.C. :
1. My attention is invited to the order dated 23.10.2023 passed by this Court in Interim Application No.2270 of 2022. Due to financial difficulties stated in the application,
the amount which was directed to be deposited by this Court in terms of clause (iv) of the operative part could not be deposited within the time stipulated.
2. Learned APP opposed the application. It is submitted that already the fine amount was reduced and hence no further indulgence should be granted as a period has expired.
1/2
PMB 902.ia-25-24.doc
3. In the interest of justice, for the reasons mentioned in the application and upon hearing learned counsel for the applicant, I am satisfied that the applicant can be granted indulgence by extending time to deposit the amount in terms of the order dated 23.10.2023 by a further period of two weeks from today. If the fine amount is deposited within a period of two weeks from today, office to accept.
4. Interim Application is disposed of.
2/2
Bhushan Ramchandra Satam
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court