Allowed

Vikrant @ Vicky Bhalchandra Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC7 Feb 2024IA/249/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay granted interim bail to the applicant in a criminal appeal. Citing Supreme Court guidelines, the Court released him on a personal bond with conditions of periodic reporting and accessory bonds.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in C.R. No. 298 of 2013 upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one or two sureties and complying with reporting conditions.

Vikrant @ Vicky Bhalchandra Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Jyoti

¶2

29-IA 249-2024 IN Apeal 1121-23.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.249 OF 2024 IN

¶5

APPEAL NO.1121 OF 2023

¶6

Vikrant @ Vicky Bhalchandra Jadhav .. Applicant v/s. State Of Maharashtra And Anr .. Respondent

¶7

JYOTI RAJESH MANE

¶8

Digitally signed by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2024.02.14 12:38:17 +0530

¶9

Mr. Sachin Deokar for the Applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent No.1- State.

¶10

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI &

¶11

SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ. DATED : 7^th FEBRUARY, 2024.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

It is admitted fact on record that the Applicant is in incarceration for more than 10 years and 6 months as of today. The coaccused in the present case are released on bail on the ground of prolonged incarceration vide Order dated 12^th January 2024.

¶14

In view of the present assignment of this Court, the possibility of hearing the substantive Appeal preferred by the Applicant in near future is remote.

¶15

In view of the Guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Saudan Singh Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh in

¶16

1/3

¶17

29-IA 249-2024 IN Apeal 1121-23.doc

¶18

Jyoti

¶19

Criminal Appeal No.308 of 2022 [ @ SLP (Cri.)No.4633 of 2021] dated 25^th March 2022 and the view expressed in cases of (i) Suleman Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh, Criminal Appeal No. 491 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No. 1451 of 2022) dated 25^th March 2022 and (ii) Dinesh @ Paul Daniel Khajekar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 2987 of 2023 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 10320 of 2023) dated 25^th September 2023, the Applicant is entitled to be released on bail during the pendency of Appeal.

¶20

1. Hence, the following Order.

¶21

(i) Applicant shall be released on bail in C.R. No. 298 of 2013 dated 9^th July 2013 registered with Hadapsar Police Station, District Pune, on his furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.50,000/- with one or two solvent local sureties in the like amount.

¶22

(ii) After his release from Jail and during the pendency of the present Appeal, the Applicant shall attend Hadapsar Police Station, District Pune on every first Monday of the month between 10:00 am and 12:00 noon initially for a period of one year.

¶23

After end of one year, the Applicant shall attend Hadapsar Police Station, District Pune on every first Monday of the every 3^rd Month between 10:00 am and 12:00 noon. The Applicant thus shall attend Hadapsar Police Station, District Pune, four times in a year during the pendency of the present Appeal.”

¶24

2/3

¶25

Jyoti

¶26

29-IA 249-2024 IN Apeal 1121-23.doc

¶27

(iii) In case of two consecutive defaults in complying with the aforestated conditions, the Prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.

¶28

(iv) Applicant shall inform his prospective residential address to the trial Court. Applicant shall keep informed the trial Court any change in his residential address and his mobile number, on which he can be contacted.

¶29

(v) Applicant shall make himself available at the time of final hearing of the Appeal.

¶30

1. Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶31

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)

¶32

3/3

Vikrant @ Vicky Bhalchandra Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikrant @ Vicky Bhalchandra Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harshal Subhashrao Timande Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shripad Dinkar Paradkar @ Nilesh Paradkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Harish Ramesh Pulekar Vs State of Maharashtra

Balasaheb Popat Dabhade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Anil Pandurang Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vinod Pannalal Yadav and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra