Rahul Navinchandra Panchal v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application for restoration of a criminal writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution was dismissed due to the applicant's absence.
Interim application for restoration of a criminal writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution was dismissed due to the applicant's absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVC 46 Ia-2332-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2332 OF 2024 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4419 OF 2018
Rahul Navinchandra Panchal … Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
… Respondents
None for Applicant.
Mr. A.S. Shalgaonkar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
API Umesh Sonwane and PSI Prakash Rathod, attached to Santacruz Police Station, Mumbai, present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 21st June 2024.
P.C. :
No.4419 of 2018, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by Order dated 19th March 2024.
( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
Digitally signed by RAJESH RAJESH VASANT VASANT CHITTEWAN CHITTEWAN Date: 2024.06.27 14:50:25 +0530
1/1
Rahul Navinchandra Panchal
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court