The Court condoned a delay of 248 days in filing an appeal after hearing counsel. The interim application for condonation was allowed and disposed of, and the appeal was directed to be registered.
Delay of 248 days condoned; appeal to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
46-IA-2304-2023.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2304 OF 2023
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 5111 OF 2023
Rajeshwari Sahu w/o. Birendra Prasad and Anr. … Applicants/
Appellants
Versus
Kailash Tukaram Satav and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Yogesh Pande, Advocate for the Applicants.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 3rd JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for
the respondents.
2.Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and
reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 248 days in filing the
appeal is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of.
3.The appeal be registered.
Digitally signed SONALI by SONALISATISH KILAJE SATISH Date: 2024.01.06 KILAJE 11:17:07+0530
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 248 days in filing the appeal is condoned?
Rajeshwari Sahu w/o. Birendra Prasad and Anr.
Kailash Tukaram Satav and Anr.
SHIVKUMAR DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court