Disposed

Vishal Shreyas Doshi v. Union of India and 3 Ors. and Bank of Baroda and 8 Ors. (Prop Resps)

Bombay HC6 Feb 2024IA/2230/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application to amend Writ Petition to join 3 proposed respondent banks was disposed of upon consent. The court directed inclusion of respondents and permitted further amendments within two weeks, without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directing joinder of Respondents No. 5 to 13 as party Respondents and permitting amendments within two weeks.

Vishal Shreyas Doshi Vs Union of India… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

16-IA-2230-2022-WP-2078-2022.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2230 OF 2022 (FOR AMENDMENT) IN

¶4

Digitally signed by SHRADDHA SHRADDHA KAMLESH KAMLESH TALEKAR TALEKAR Date: 2024.02.07 13:12:14 +0530

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 2078 OF 2022

¶6

Vishal Shreyas Doshi ...Applicant

¶7

In the matter of :

¶8

Vishal Shreyas Doshi .. Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

Union of India represented by its Secretary & 8 Ors. …Respondents

¶11

Mr.Cyrus Ardeshir a/w. Ms.Meenakshi Pahuja i/b ANB Legal, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Y.R. Mishra, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

¶13

Ms.Harsha Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.4 and other proposed Respondents.

¶14

CORAM : B.P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.

¶15

DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2024.

¶16

Shraddha Talekar, PS

¶17

Page 1 of 3 February 02, 2024

¶18

16-IA-2230-2022-WP-2078-2022.doc

¶19

P C :

¶20

The above Interim Application is filed seeking amendment of the above Writ Petition to join proposed Respondent Nos.5 to 13 as Party Respondents to the above Writ Petition. They are basically all Banks and which form a part of the consortium lead by Bank of India.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Bank of India (Original Respondent No.4) has stated that she has instructions to even appear for all the proposed Respondents. She fairly submitted that this being a formal amendment, there cannot be any real opposition for the same. In these circumstances, proposed Respondent Nos.5 to 13 are directed to be joined as Party Respondents to the above Writ Petition as per Schedule-I of the above Interim Application. Additionally, the Petitioner is permitted to amend the Petition as per Schedule -II of the said Interim Application as well. The amendments shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from today and the amended copy of the Writ Petition shall be served on the Advocates for all the Respondents (including the newly added Respondents), within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶22

The Interim Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

Page 2 of 3 February 02, 2024

¶24

Shraddha Talekar, PS

¶25

16-IA-2230-2022-WP-2078-2022.doc

¶26

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶27

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. ]

¶28

[ B.P. COLABAWALLA, J. ]

¶29

Page 3 of 3 February 02, 2024

¶30

Shraddha Talekar, PS

Vishal Shreyas Doshi v. Union of India and 3 Ors. and Bank of Baroda and 8 Ors. (Prop Resps)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Shreyas Doshi v. Union of India and 3 Ors. and Bank of Baroda and 8 Ors. (Prop Resps)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwanbhai K. Kajavadra vs Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs and 2 Ors.

Ambit Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shahi Zaika Family Restaurant and Ors.

Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. Trhou. Its Authorised Officer and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Honble Addl District Magistrate Thane and Ors.

Mohammed Shakeel Khamker Alias Pathan vs Lotus Engicons Private Limited

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. vs Ramesh Constructions

Bhagwanbhai K. Kajavadra vs Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs and 2 Ors.