Allowed
Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxtation 4 Mumbai v. Viacom 18 Media Private Limited Ay 2018-19
Bombay HCIA/2229/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Delay of 14 days in filing the appeal condoned; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
315-IA-2229-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2229 OF 2024 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 34471 OF 2022
PR Commissioner of Income Tax IT-4 Mumbai ...Applicant Versus Viacom18 Media Private Ltd. ...Respondent
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the Applicant. Mr. P.C. Tripathi, a/w Ketan Dave, i/b A.S. Dayal & Associates, for the Respondent.
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
Date: 14 NOVEMBER, 2024.
P.C.
in filing the appeal.
is made out to condone the delay. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (g), which is reproduced as under :-
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [G. S. KULKARNI, J.]
Page 1 of 1
Mayur Adane, PA
PR Commissioner of Income Tax IT-4 Mumbai
Viacom18 Media Private Ltd.
G. S. Kulkarni
Advait M. Sethna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court