Vinay Premchand Kothari v. Alok Premchand Kothari (Caveator)
Case brief
What is this about?
This court rejected an interim application by a petitioner seeking dismissal of a caveat and amendment of a testamentary petition in an intestacy case, deeming such matters to be decided on merits via separate applications. The caveat was upheld.
What did the court decide?
Application seeking dismissal of caveat and permission to amend petition rejected with liberty to file separate applications.
What the court decided
8_IA2074_20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2074 OF 2020
IN CAVEAT NO.130 OF 2018 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.1530 OF 2017
Vinay Premchand Kothari … Applicant Vs. Alok Premchand Kothari … Caveator
Mr. Mayur Vinod Faria for Applicant.
Ms. Sneha Golecha i/b. M/s. Purnanand & Co. for Caveator.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : APRIL 23, 2024
P.C. :
- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
- In this application seeking dismissal of the caveat, the learned counsel appearing for the caveator has tendered reply affidavit. The same is taken on record. The present application in which the caveat was filed in the testamentary petition seeking issuance of letters of administration in favour of the petitioner, the caveator is the petitioner’s brother.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vinay Premchand Kothari
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court