Disposed

Krishnat Ramchandra Manchanpalli v. Swakulsali Samaj Shri. Maruti Deosthan and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Jan 2024IA/2055/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an interim application for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for non-removal of objections and disposed of the main writ petition as not pressed.

What did the court decide?

Interim application allowed; Writ Petition disposed of as not pressed; Petitioner granted six months to vacate premises subject to undertaking.

Krishnat Ramchandra Manchanpalli Vs Swakulsali Samaj… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

11-ia2055-23.doc

¶2

vai

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

Digitally signed by VASANT VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.01.11 18:39:37 +0530

¶6

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2055 OF 2023 IN

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO.1455 OF 2004

¶8

Krishnat R. Manchanpalli ...Applicant V/s. Shree Swakulsali Samaj Maruti Deostan and others ...Respondents

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

Mr.Surel S. Shah for the Applicant.

¶11

Mr.Gurunath K. Manchanpalli present in Court.

¶12

Mr.Ajit V. Alange for the Respondents.

¶13

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 9TH JANUARY, 2024.

¶14

P.C. :-

¶15

This Interim Application is filed for restoration of the

¶16

Writ Petition, which was dismissed for non-removal of the office

¶17

objections. There is delay in filing the Writ Petition.

¶18

Mr.Alange, advocate appears for the original

Respondents.

1/3

11-ia2055-23.doc

Heard. I have gone through the contents of the Interim

¶23

Application. Case is made out to allow this Interim Application. The Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c).

¶24

The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶25

WITH

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO.1455 OF 2004

¶27

Mr.Surel Shah, advocate appears for the Applicant on

¶28

instructions of one Mr.Gurunath K. Manchanpalli, who identifies himself as the son of the original Petitioner, informs this Court that the Petitioner is the original tenant, who are ready to vacate the suit premises, subject to reasonable time to vacate the same is given.

¶29

Mr.Alange submits that he will have to take

¶30

instructions from his client. Mr.Shah on instructions from the son of the Petitioner, who is present in Court submits that the Petitioner’s son is ready to vacate the suit premises and hand

¶31

over possession within six months from today to the Respondents.

¶32

2/3

¶33

11-ia2055-23.doc

¶34

Suffice will be the purpose if the Petitioner and his

¶35

family members give the usual undertaking to this Court within

¶36

a period of one week from today. The Petitioner is granted time

¶37

of six months to vacate the suit premises subject to filing of usual undertaking to vacate by the Petitioner and his adult family members within one week. A copy of such undertaking should be furnished to the Respondents within one week from today.

¶38

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, as not

¶39

pressed.

¶40

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶41

3/3

Krishnat Ramchandra Manchanpalli v. Swakulsali Samaj Shri. Maruti Deosthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnat Ramchandra Manchanpalli v. Swakulsali Samaj Shri. Maruti Deosthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudha Jayshankar Pillai Thr Poa Amish Ashwin Shah and Anr. Vs Surendra Pratap Singh

Mr. Yang Yau Shin Vs Sonal Anuj Mehra

Mrs. Pooja Jagannath Pimple Vs Additional Commissioner Kokan Division

Dr. Laxmikanta @ Vijayalaxmi Subhash Poreddi Vs Satyanarayan Rajmalu Samal and Anr.

Shri Ulhas Narayan Gupte Vs Shri.Nihal Keshrinath Tambe and Ors.

Shri Ulhas Narayan Gupte (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Amogh Ulhas Gupte and Anr. Vs Shri.Nihal Keshrinath Tambe and Ors.