This is a thin order. The court corrected a typographical error in the caption of a previous order (changing 'Contempt Petition' to 'Company Petition') and disposed of the mention. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P1_IAL9524_21.doc
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.471 OF 2012
Vinay Shah … Applicant In the matter between: State Bank of Hyderabad … Petitioner Vs. The Official Liquidator of Twilight Litaka Pharma Limited (In Liqn.) … Respondent
Ms. Saloni Manjrekar i/b. Mr. Harsh L. Behany for the Applicant.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : JANUARY 3, 2024
P.C. :
. Not on Board. Mentioned by way of praecipe seeking speaking to the minutes in respect of order dated 22.12.2023.
MINAL Digitally signedby MINALSANDIP PARAB SANDIPPARAB Date:2024.01.0314:20:49+0530
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
1/1
Minal Parab
Vinay Shah
State Bank of Hyderabad
The Official Liquidator of Twilight Litaka Pharma Limited (In Liqn.)
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
