The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of an interim application in PIL No. 134 of 2009 by dismissing it as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate recourse.
Application dismissed with liberty to take appropriate recourse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-IA.196.2024
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 196 OF 2024 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 134 OF 2009
Digamber Raghunath Mungekar & Anr. } Applicants In the matter between
Digamber Raghunath Mungekar & Anr. } Petitioners versus
JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATHSALUNKE Date: 2024.04.24 14:51:41 +0530
The Municipal Corporation of Greater } Mumbai & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Yatin R. Shah for the applicants/petitioners.
Ms. Oorja Dhond i/b. Mr. S. K. Sonawane for respondent no. 1 (MCGM).
Mr. T. J. Pandian with Mr. Gautam Modanwal for respondent no. 2.
Ms. Vaishali Choudhari, Additional Government Pleader for respondent no. 3.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE: 24th APRIL 2024
P.C.:
1. Learned counsel representing the applicants/petitioners states that the application may be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate recourse, which may be available to the applicants/petitioners, for redressal of their grievances.
2. The application is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Jayant Vishwanath Salunke
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
