In an interim application connected to a writ petition, the single judge refused an early hearing date due to the backlog in the court's final hearing roster. The registry was directed to list the petition according to its turn.
Registry directed to add petition to final hearing board as per its turn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Digitally signed by VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Date: 2024.01.19 11:36:49 +0530
29-ia-17613-2023.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17613 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9012 OF 2023
… Applicant Amol Mohan Waghmare
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Sou. Vaishali Nitin Patil … Petitioner
vs.
Amol Mohan Waghmare and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Sachin Dhakephalkar, for the Petitioner in WP/9012/23.
Mr. Manish Kelkar for Applicant and respondent nos.1 in WP/9012/23.
Mrs. Madhubala Kajale, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 6-State.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 17th JANUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
admitted on 21th July 2023 and after hearing respondents, interim relief is granted. The said order was challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court. However, SLP was dismissed and the applicant was
granted liberty to move this Court for appropriate relief.
Page no. 1 of 2
29-ia-17613-2023.doc
said liberty, present application is filed.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim application can be listed for early hearing given the pendency of related petitions.
Vaishali Nitin Patil
Amol Mohan Waghmare
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
