Interim application sought discharge of a caveat in a testamentary petition. The caveat had already been dismissed as withdrawn, rendering the application infructuous; the court disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P1-IA1724-2024+.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1724 OF 2024
IN
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.06.24 16:56:07 +0530
CAVEAT (L) NO. 425 OF 2024 IN PETITION NO. 1909 OF 2023
Himanshu Chandrakant Doshi ...Applicant/
Petitioner
Versus Krupa Rahul Jhaveri nee Krupa Vikram …Caveator/ Doshi Respondent
Rasiklal Amritlal Doshi ...Deceased
Ms. Gargi Bhagwat, i/b M/s. Divekar Bhagwat & Co., for the Applicant/Petitioner.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 21st JUNE, 2024
PC:-
already been dismissed as withdrawn on 19th June, 2024.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Himanshu Chandrakant Doshi
Krupa Rahul Jhaveri nee Krupa Vikram Doshi
Rasiklal Amritlal Doshi
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
