This is a civil appellate side interim application disposed of on words. The court allowed the application in terms of prayer clauses.
The application was allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (c) ALTERNATIVELY.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
269-IA-1656-2024.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1656 OF 2024
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17205 OF 2018
National Insurance Co. Ltd.….Applicant
Versus
Shri Dilip Manohar Jawalkar & Ors.….Respondents
Digitally signed bySHANTANU SHANTANU SHANKARSA SHANKARSA DHUDUM DHUDUM Date: 2024.02.17 12:12:39 +0530
Ms. Harshada M. Rane, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Zeal Keria i/b Mr. A. M. Gokhale, Advocate for the Respondent
No.1.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 14th FEBRUARY, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned
counsel for the Respondent.
2. Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and
reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in
terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (c) ALTERNATIVELY and
disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Shri Dilip Manohar Jawalkar
SHIVKUMAR DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court