This party listed first as applicant. Disposed of an interim application by allowing the prayer clauses and listing the main appeal for final hearing. DIVISIBLES remainder. The single order provided only para 2
Interim application allowed; main appeal listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
9-ia-15754.23.doc
BIPIN DHARMENDER Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2024.01.09 16:36:31 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15754 OF 2023
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2007
Keshav Ramchandra Waichal
Versus
Murlidhar Ramchandra Waichal … Respondent
Mr. D. S. Sutar a/w Kiran G. Kulkarni, Darshana Jain and Deepak Jain for the Appellant.
Mr. T. S. Ingale for Respondent.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 9 JANUARY 2024
P.C. :-
. For the reasons stated in the application, the present interim application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Keshav Ramchandra Waichal
Murlidhar Ramchandra Waichal
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
