Disposed

Deepa Anil Menez and Anr. v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai

Bombay HC16 Dec 2024IA/15735/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Claimants in a motor accident claim appeal sought withdrawal of Rs.3,20,65,756/- deposited by the insurer before the MACT. The court prima facie found some amount need not be withheld: Rs.75 lakhs stays invested for the minor until majority; claimant No.1 may withdraw Rs.75 lakhs on an undertaking to refund with interest at disposal of the appeal.

What the court decided

AI extract

Deepa Anil Menez and Anr. vs Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co… — Insurance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

10.ia.15735.24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15735 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL(ST)NO.30779 OF 2023

¶3

Deepa Anil Menezes & Anr .. Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Royal Sundaram Alliance Ins.Co Ltd ..Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

Deepa Anil Menezes & Anr .. Respondents And Paras Shah ..Respondent No.3

¶6

Mr.Avadhut Bidaye , with Mr. Aditya Kode i/b Bidaye & Associates, Advocates for the Applicant/Orig.Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶7

ANJALI Digitally signed byANJALI TUSHAR TUSHAR ASWALEDate: 2024.12.17 ASWALE 00:03:06 +0530

¶8

Mr.Nikhil Mehta (through VC) i/b KMC Legal Venture, Advocates for the Orig.Appellant.

¶9

CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA &

¶10

SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2024

¶11

P. C.

¶12

The above Interim Application is filed by the Applicants (Original Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the Appeal) to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the Appellant in the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (“MACT”). The amount deposited in the MACT is a sum of Rs.3,20,65,756/-, which is inclusive of interest upto a certain date.

¶13

Page 1 of 4 DECEMBER 16, 2024

¶14

Aswale

¶15

10.ia.15735.24.doc

¶16

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company (the Appellant) vehemently opposed the withdrawal of any amount by the Applicants/Original Respondent Nos.1 and 2. The ground on which it is opposed is that the entire quantum awarded by the MACT is disputed by the Insurance Company, on the ground of negligence.

¶17

We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants (Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the Appeal) as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant. We have also perused the impugned order. Considering that the Applicants have succeeded before the MACT, we are not satisfied, at-least prima facie, that no amount awarded by the MACT, (although it is seriously disputed) needs to be held back from the Appellant. We are of the view that the Applicants can be permitted to withdraw certain amounts as more particularly set out hereinbelow. Accordingly, we pass the following order:-

¶18

a) As per the order of the MACT, the amount of Rs.75 Lakhs shall continue to remain invested in the name of the minor (Respondent No.2) in a Fixed Deposit of any Nationalized Bank under the guardianship of his mother (Respondent

¶19

Page 2 of 4 DECEMBER 16, 2024

¶20

Aswale

¶21

10.ia.15735.24.doc

¶22

No.1) until he attains the age of majority. On attaining the

¶23

age of majority, Respondent No.2 shall be entitled to withdraw the amount of Rs.75 Lakhs along with accrued interest, if any, subject to Respondent No.2 giving an undertaking to the MACT that he shall bring back the aforesaid amount with such rate of interest as may be directed by this Court at the time of disposal of the Appeal.

¶24

b) Applicant No.1 (Original Respondent no. 1 in the Appeal) is permitted to withdraw an amount of Rs.75 Lakhs deposited before the MACT on furnishing an undertaking to the MACT that she shall bring back the amount with such rate of interest as may directed by this Court at the time of hearing of the Appeal. The balance amount deposited by the Appellant shall be invested by the MACT in a Fixed Deposit of any Nationalized Bank and shall be renewed from time to time and will abide by the final orders passed in the above Appeal.

¶25

At this stage the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants stated that at the time of the filing of the above Appeal, the

¶26

Page 3 of 4 DECEMBER 16, 2024

¶27

Aswale

¶28

10.ia.15735.24.doc

¶29

Appellant has also deposited in this Court, a sum of Rs.25,000/-. He requested that this amount also be transferred to MACT. It is accordingly so ordered and the Registry to act accordingly.

¶30

The above Interim Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶32

[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶33

Page 4 of 4 DECEMBER 16, 2024

¶34

Aswale

Deepa Anil Menez and Anr. v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Deepa Anil Menez and Anr. v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deven Yogesh Kanani vs Director General of Civil Aviation

Yashwanti Sagar Salgar vs Sagar Dnyaneshwar Salgar

Yashwanti Sagar Salgar vs Sagar Dnyaneshwar Salgar

Akshit Sumatichandra Mehta vs Regional Passport Office, Mumbai

Deven Yogesh Kanani vs Director General of Civil Aviation

Unique Estates Development Co.Ltd. vs Eldred Anthony Nicholas Lobo and 4 Ors. (Prop Resp))