An interim application in a writ petition already disposed of sought substantive mandamus reliefs. The Bench held this impermissible and dismissed the application without examining rival contentions, leaving all parties' merits contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.IA.15597-2024.DOCX
Amol
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15597 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 16172 OF 2024
AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV
Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.12.07 16:16:23 +0530
Smt. Samina Raza Murad and Ors. …Applicants In the matter between Smt. Samina Raza Murad and Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents ______________________________________________________
Mr Abhishek Sawant , a/w Mr Sumit Pandey i/b. M/s. Solicis Lex, for the Applicant.
Ms Neha Bhide , GP , with Mr Aasif Patel , Addl. GP , & Mr VG Budgujar, AGP , for Respondent-State.
CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 7 December 2024 (In Chamber) PC:-
Page 1 of 2
1.IA.15597-2024.DOCX
(Jitendra Jain, J)
(M.S. Sonak, J)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether substantive reliefs in the nature of a writ of mandamus can be sought by an interim application in a writ petition already disposed of.
Smt. Samina Raza Murad and Ors.
Smt. Samina Raza Murad and Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
M.S. Sonak
Jitendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
