Allowed

Godrej and Boyce Mfg Co. Ltd. v. Mr Sudhir Madhav Yadav

Bombay HC5 Jan 2024IA/14115/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application in a second appeal sought permission to carry out repairs in the suit premises. The applicant undertook not to carry out structural additions or alterations, the respondents raised no objection, and the application was allowed for the specified repairs.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to carry out the specified repairs in the suit premises, with undertaking of no structural additions or alterations.

Godrej and Boyce Mfg Co. Ltd. Vs Mr Sudhir Madhav Yadav — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

rsk 502-IA-14115-23.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.14115 OF 2023 IN

¶4

SECOND APPEAL NO.474 OF 2016

¶5

Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. ...Applicants V/s. Sudhir Madhav Yadav and Ors. ...Respondents.

¶6

Mr. Mandar Soman for the Applicants.

¶7

Mr. Kailas Dewal i/b Mr. Yash Dewal a/w. Mr. Sham Thakur for the Respondents.

¶8

CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

¶9

DATE : 5^th JANUARY, 2024.

¶10

P. C.:-

¶11

Interim Application has been preferred seeking permission to

¶12

carry out repairs in the suit premises. Upon a query by this Court as to the exact nature of proposed repairs to be carried out, a compilation containing

¶13

the photographs and the description of the repairs has been tendered by learned counsel for the applicant. Same is taken on record.

¶14

Perusal of the documents would indicate that applicant seeks to

¶15

repair the shutter which has fallen down and to repair rest of the shutters which are in bad shape. In addition, applicant wants to carry out painting

¶16

work in the shop and remove the fungus by painting walls in the pantry area

¶17

Digitally signed by RAJESHWARISUBODHKARVE RAJESHWARISUBODHKARVEDate: 2024.01.06 12:31:37 +0530

¶18

1/2

¶19

rsk 502-IA-14115-23.doc

¶20

and the washroom. The applicant seeks to change the old pipes, bathroom fittings and tiles of the washroom, as also to install washbasin and flush tank and paint the specific areas as well as change the fittings which have been marked in the photographs contained in the compilation.

¶21

Mr. Dewal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has

¶22

no objection for this specific repairs being carried out subject to the caveat that there should be no structural repairs or alterations.

¶23

Mr. Soman, learned counsel appearing for the applicant makes a statement that no structural additions or alterations will be carried out. Statement is accepted as undertaking to this Court.

¶24

In light of above, Interim Application is allowed to the extent

¶25

of repairs which are indicated above. Interim Application stands allowed.

¶26

(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.)

¶27

2/2

Godrej and Boyce Mfg Co. Ltd. v. Mr Sudhir Madhav Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Godrej and Boyce Mfg Co. Ltd. v. Mr Sudhir Madhav Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Vashdev Laungani Vs Namrata Kamlesh Laungani

Abdul Ahad Mohd. Ismail and Another Vs a. Sahebrao Hari Ptil and Others

Abdul Ahad Mohd. Ismail and Another Vs a. Sahebrao Hari Ptil and Others

Venuabai S. Gahin Thr. Her Duly Constituted Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Sandesh Ananda Thombare Vs Shripati Sitaram Gahin(Deceased Thr.Lrs) Appa Shripati Gahin and Ors.

Vihita Aniket Waikar and Anr. Vs Aniket Ajit Waikar and Ors.

Vilas Harisingh Jamadar Vs Krishnaji Ganesh Kulkarni