Writ petition withdrawn by counsel at the outset before any hearing; court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, kept all contentions open, and disposed of the interim application as nothing survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 901 wp 5280 of 2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5280 OF 2019
Badruddin Abbas Patel….Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.….Respondents
ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1342 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5280 OF 2019
Mr.Nikhil Maneshinde i/b. Anandini Fernandes, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr.Rajesh Kachare a/w. Mr.Amol P. Mhatre and Mr.Sameer
Mhatre, Advocate for the Intervenor.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 19th MARCH 2024.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI RAJESHRI PRAKASH PRAKASH AHER AHER Date: 2024.03.21 13:54:47 +0530
1 When the Petition was called out, the learned counsel
for the Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Petition.
Rajeshri Aher
2/2 901 wp 5280 of 2019.doc
2 The Petition is accordingly disposed of, as withdrawn.3 We make it clear that we have not heard the Petitionon merits and as such all contentions of all the parties are kept
open.
4In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing
survives for consideration in the Interim Application, the same is
also disposed of.
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE J.
Rajeshri Aher
Badruddin Abbas Patel
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court