An interim criminal appeal application was dismissed after the map failed to appear for over two years, leading the court to find the applicant uninterested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVC 16 IA-1236-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1236 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 766 OF 2023
Sitaram Janaba Chalake
… Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra… Respondent
None for Applicant.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 12thFebruary 2024
P.C. :
1)None for Applicant.
2)Record indicates that, even on prior occasions, i.e. 1st December
2023 and 29th January, 2024, none had appeared for the Applicant. That, on
5th January 2024 and 12th January, 2024, the Advocate for Applicant had
sought adjournments.
3)It appears that, Applicant is not interested in pursuing the
Application.
4)Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. )( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Digitally signed by RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Date: 2024.02.23 13:22:53 +0530
RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN
Sitaram Janaba Chalake
State of Maharashtra
A. S. GADKARI
SHYAM C. CHANDAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court