An interim application filed by an applicant challenging MHADA's non-compliance with a previous order for measurement and sketch preparation was disposed of without adjudication, as the matter was settled during hearing.
Interim Application disposed of. No specific relief granted as matters were settled during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907 IA 1077 of 2024 (OS).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1077 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3441 OF 2023
Mahendra C. Shah
...Applicant
In the matter between :
Mahendra C. Shah … Petitioner
Versus
The Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board & Ors.
...Respondents
...
Mr. Nitin Thakkar, Sr. Advocate a/w. Gopal N. Parab, for Applicant.
Mr. P. G. Lad, a/w. Ms. Sayali Apte & Ms. Shreya Shah, for MHADA - Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Milind More, Addl. GP for State – Respondent No.3.
Mr. Amogh Singh, a/w. Mr. Rahul Arora i/b. Mr. Jeet Gandhi, for Respondent No.5.
...
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 24 APRIL 2024.
P.C.:
Page 1 of 2 24 APRIL 2024
907 IA 1077 of 2024 (OS).docx
submits that MHADA’s ofocials have visited premises and have conducted measurements. The sketch is also prepared. He would however submit that Applicant has not been given any intimation about outcome of said visit as no report appears to have been prepared.
Digitally signed KISHOR by KISHORVISHNU VISHNU KAMBLE KAMBLE Date:2024.04.26 22:32:26 +0530
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Page 2 of 2 24 APRIL 2024
Kishor
Mahendra C. Shah
The Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
