Rs.4,000/- per month. There is no reason to disbelieve evidence of this evidence. Hence, I am considering Rs.4,000/- as monthly income of the claimant. While awarding compensation the Tribunal has applied multiplier 16, it should be 18. As claimant was 19 years old at the time of accident hence, I am considering multiplier of 18. The Tribunal has not awarded future prospects. The claimant has suffered 89% permanent physical disability due to accidental injuries, it is 100% functional disability. As per the view of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi, 2017 ACJ 2700 (SC) , the claimant is entitled for 40% future prospects. The Tribunal has awarded compensation for pain and suffering at Rs.75,000/- as both legs of the claimant have been amputated hence, I am considering additional Rs.50,000/-. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.1,20,000/- for prosthetic leg as both legs of the claimant have been amputated. At the time of accident, he was 19 years old. He needs the amount to replace of his leg of every 4 to 5 years hence, I am considering Rs.15,00,000/- for prosthetic leg. The Tribunal has not awarded compensation for loss of amenities in life hence, I am considering Rs.1,00,000/- for it. The Tribunal has not awarded amount for loss of expectation of life, I am considering it at
