Disposed

State of Mah and Anr. v. Gherdhar Nana Walke

Bombay HC14 Dec 2024FA/1913/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The National Lok Adalat disposed of three group appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra on withdrawal by the appellants and pending civil applications, following a Government of Maharashtra policy decision regarding undisputed deposits.

What did the court decide?

Appeals standing disposed of as withdrawn along with pending Civil Applications; Court fee refund certificate to be issued.

State of Mah and Anr. Vs Gherdhar Nana Walke — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:30882

¶2

131, 134, 135

¶3

-1-

¶4

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY SHRI V. B. MANTRI (RETD.)DISTRICT JUDGE HELD ON 14.12.2024 AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD

¶5

131 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1913 OF 2009

¶6

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

….Appellants

VERSUS

GHERDHAR NANA WALKE

…..Respondent

Advocate for Appellant/State : Mr. A. M. Phule Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. S. L. Bhapkar

¶12

AND

¶13

134 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1823 OF 2010

¶14

WITH

¶15

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1824 OF 2010

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

….Appellant

VERSUS

RAMKISHAN DAGDU KALASKAR

¶20

…..Respondent

¶21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. M. Phule Advocate for Respondent Nos.1,2, & 3 : Mr. B. A. Shinde

¶22

135 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2071 OF 2010

¶23

WITH

¶24

FIRST APPEAL NO. 2081 OF 2010

¶25

WITH

¶26

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11476 OF 2009

IN FA/2071/2010

131, 134, 135

-2-

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶31

….Appellants

¶32

VERSUS

¶33

ASHOK HARIBHAU KEDAR AND OTHERS

¶34

…..Respondents

¶35

Advocate for Appellants : Mr. A. M. Phule Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : mr. D. R. Jayabhar

¶36

ORDER

¶37

These appeals are placed before the National Lok Adalat by the appellant-State.

¶38

Mr. A. G. Phule, learned AGP for the appellant/State submitted that the above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by the Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014/pra.kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3^rd November, 2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23^rd February, 2017 and 13^th August, 2018 to the said Government Resolution. In turn, this group of appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals.

¶39

The learned AGP for the State submits that entire amount in

¶40

these appeals has been deposited and latter on withdrawn by the original claimants by obtaining orders from this Court. He further submits that in these circumstances, nothing survived in these

131, 134, 135

-3-

appeals.

However, in case, any amount is lying with this Court, then the same shall be transmitted to the reference Court. The reference Court shall disburse the said amount to the original claimants on their applications. The claimants are at liberty to make application before the reference Court and withdraw the said amount.

¶45

The above numbered appeals stand disposed of as withdrawn along with pending Civil Applications. No order as to costs.

¶46

The Court fee refund certificate be issued as per the provisions under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act.

¶47

(A.R. BORULKAR) (S. G. SHETE) (V. B. MANTRI) Advocate District Judge (Retd.) District Judge (Retd.) Member Member Head of the Panel

¶48

Date: 14.12.2024 Place: Aurangabad

¶49

Y.S. Kulkarni/ P.A.

State of Mah and Anr. v. Gherdhar Nana Walke

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Mah and Anr. v. Gherdhar Nana Walke

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohanlal Sukhalal Jaiswal and Anr. vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer,(L.S.K.) Buldhana and Anr.

The Oriential Insurance Co. Ltd. Gulbarga through the Branch Manager vs Vilas Ramchandra Vibhute and Others

The Oriential Insurance Co. Ltd. Gulbarga through the Branch Manager vs Vilas Ramchandra Vibhute and Others

State of Maharashtra Vs Ramkishan Dagdu Kalaskar

Chabdrakalabai Dattaroa Shelke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Latabai Piraji Horshil and Ors. Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Divisional Manager and Ors.