The petitioner stated that the term for which the election was held had expired, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the election petition as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:12178
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
ELECTION PETITION NO.11/2019
Nandesh @ Nandkumar Sheshrao Ambadkar
...Versus…
The Election Commission of India Through its Chairman, New Delhi (Deleted) Returning Officer, Amravati (Deleted) Mrs. Navneet Ravi Rana
Mr. S.D. Chopde, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.Z. Qazi, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 25/10/2024
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Wadkar
Nandesh @ Nandkumar Sheshrao Ambadkar
The Election Commission of India Through its Chairman, New Delhi (Deleted) Returning Officer, Amravati (Deleted) Mrs. Navneet Ravi Rana
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
