Court Receiver sought discharge without passing accounts, alleging parties to the commercial suit were not co-operating. Plaintiffs showed pending litigation encumbered secured properties. Court found no case for discharge made out and dismissed the report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 4-CRR-414-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO. 414 OF 2024
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 328 OF 2018
Vikram B. Trivedi and Anr.
V/s.
Kalpavruksha Developers and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Senior Counsel a/w Aaron Kevin Fernandes i/b Mulla and Mulla & Craigie, Blunt and Caroe for Plaintiffs. Mr. Dipesh Siroya for Respondents Nos.1,3,4 & 5. Mr. N.C. Pawar, OSD to Court Receiver, present.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER 2024
P.C. :
1 of 3
Ajit
2 4-CRR-414-23.doc
today submitted that the present Report would be disposed of in view of what has been recorded in the Minutes of Meeting dated 13th November 2024 held by the First Assistant to the Court Receiver.
2 of 3
Ajit
3 4-CRR-414-23.doc
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
3 of 3
Ajit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court Receiver should be discharged without passing of accounts on the ground that the parties were not co-operating with him.
Vikram B. Trivedi
Kalpavruksha Developers
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
