The Single Judge listed a report of the Court Receiver for further consideration. The Plaintiff stated an intention to deposit sums for rent and corpus fund and clarified an allotment of a flat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed by MANDIRAMILIND SALGAONKARDate: 2024.05.10 22:58:39+0530
1/2 501 CRR-203-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.203 OF 2024
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.98 OF 2019
Shree Hans Realtors LLP
.. Plaintiff
Versus
Top In Town Co-Operative Housing .. Defendants Society Ltd. & Ors.
Mr.Amogh Singh i/b Mr.Bhavin Bhatia for the Plaintiff.
Mr.Prayag Joshi for the Defendant No.1.
Mr.Manish Upadhye, AGP for the State of Maharashtra/ Defendant Nos.2 and 3.
Mr.S.K.Dhekale, Court Receiver, High Court Bombay, present.
Mr.N.C.Pawar, Officer on Special Duty, High Court Bombay, present.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 10th MAY, 2024
P.C:-
Further, he also categorically states that as far as prayer clause (c) in the Court Receiver’s Report is concerned, which has a mention of flat bearing No.103, in the wake of the subsequent
M.M.Salgaonkar
2/2 501 CRR-203-24.odt
development now, what is allotted to the Plaintiff is flat No.1004 and he shall produce the necessary documents to that effect before the Court Receiver.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
