Commercial IP suit settled by Consent Terms between plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 3 and 4. Court decreed the suit in terms of specified prayer clauses, discharged the Court Receiver, disposed of interim application, and recorded payment of Rs. 25,000 by demand draft to the plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-COMIPL-7315-24.doc
Sharayu Khot.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL IPR SUIT (L) NO. 7315 OF 2024
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 7491 OF 2024
WITH
LEAVE PETITION (L) NO. 7497 OF 2024
WITH
COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO. 170 OF 2024
IN
COMMERCIAL IPR SUIT (L) NO. 7315 OF 2024
Marico Ltd. …Plaintiff
Versus
Zenith Industries & Ors. …Defendants
Mr. Hiren Kamod (thru VC), with Mr. Nishad Nadkarni, Mr. Aasif Navodia, Ms. Khushboo Jhunjhunwala, Ms. Rakshita Singh and Ms. Jaanvi Chopra i/b. Khaitan and Co. for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Anoop Sharma for the Defendant Nos. 3 and 4.
SHARAYU PANDURANG KHOT
Digitally signed by SHARAYU PANDURANG KHOT Date: 2024.12.16 18:21:38 +0530
Ms. Charushila M. Vaidya, 2nd Asstt. Court Receiver present. Mr. Mohit Soni, Authorised Signatory of the Plaintiff present thru VC. Mr. Ketubhai Shah, Defendant No. 3 present thru VC.
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J
DATE : 12 December 2024
1/5
12-COMIPL-7315-24.doc
ORDER :
2/5
12-COMIPL-7315-24.doc
contrary to law and have been drawn by the parties of their own volition in reflection of their true intentions.
in favour of the Plaintiff in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (k) of the Plaint.
the Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (k) of the Plaint.
Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 have undertaken to destroy the impugned goods/material seized, sealed and kept at the Defendants’ premises
by the Court Receiver within a period of seven days from the date of
3/5
12-COMIPL-7315-24.doc
the Consent Terms.
disposed of.
disposed of.
4/5
12-COMIPL-7315-24.doc
Nos. 3 and 4 is dispensed with unless the parties seek drawn up decree/ order, in which case they are entitled to apply.
as the second order in the matter.
signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on file as part of the record and is not sent for destruction in the ordinary course.
5/5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Consent Terms settlement between Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 could be accepted and the suit decreed accordingly.
Marico Ltd.
Zenith Industries
Defendant No. 3
Defendant No. 4
R.I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
