Application seeking condonation of a 68-day delay in filing an appeal against the respondent's acquittal. The court accepted the reasons given, condoned the delay, allowed the application, and directed the Office to register the application for leave to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRMA 31 of 2022
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.31 OF 2022 WITH STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO.2754 OF 2019 (F)
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.31 OF 2022
STATE OF GOA, THR. OFFICER IN
CHARGE, PONDA POLICE STATION Versus
DURGADAS GAUDE
... APPLICANT
... RESPONDENT
WITH STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO.2754 OF 2019 (F)
STATE OF GOA, THR. OFFICER IN CHARGE, PONDA POLICE STATION Versus
DURGADAS GAUDE
... PETITIONER
... RESPONDENT
Mr G. Nagvekar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the applicant. Ms S. Shaikh, Advocate holding for Mr. A. Bhobe, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:- AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATED :- 11th March, 2024
P.C.
Heard Mr G. Nagvekar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the applicant.
Page 1 of 2
11th March, 2024
CRMA 31 of 2022
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
VINITA VIKAS NAIK Digitally signed by VINITA VIKAS NAIK Date: 2024.03.11 16:59:34 +05'30'
Page 2 of 2
11th March, 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Should the 68-day delay in filing an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent be condoned?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Goa, thr. Officer in Charge, Ponda Police Station
Durgadas Gaude
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
