Oral order dismissing an application regarding compliance with suspension conditions; no substantive legal question arises. The matter was disposed of upon recording that conditions were met and the respondent was absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRMA 9 of 2024
shakuntala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2024 SUSHANT PREMANAND KAVLEKAR ... APPLICANT
Versus
JEEJAMATA MULTIPURPOSE URBAN COOPERATIIVE CREDIT SOCIETY REP. BY ITS MANAGER JAYESH GAONKAR AND ANR
... RESPONDENTS
Mr Ashay Priolkar, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED :- 16th April, 2024
ORAL ORDER
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 1 of 1
16th April, 2024
Sushant Premanand Kavlekar
Jejamata Multipurpose Urban Cooperative Credit Society
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
