In Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2016, the High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed the appeal as not pressed since the appellant ceased to prosecute following full payment of the cheque amount by the non-applicant.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRIA 70 of 2016
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.70 OF 2016
THE JEEJAMATA MULTIPURPOSE URBAN CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, DAYANAND C. CHARI., Versus SUNIL S. NAIK AND ANR.,
... APPELLANT
... RESPONDENTS
Mr P. Sawant, Advocate for the appellant Mr D. Naik Advocate for the respondent no.1.
CORAM:- AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATED :- 21st March, 2024
P.C.
Learned counsel for the appellant upon instruction states that the entire cheque amount has been paid by the non-applicant on account of which the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal. Accepting the statement, appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
Page 1 of 1
21st March, 2024
The Jeejamata Multipurpose Urban Co-op. Society Ltd.
Sunil S. Naik
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
