Shri Shridhar Suresh Gaikar v. Sudam Dala Rajput

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.744 OF 2023

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders	Court’s or Judge’s orders
CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II)
DATE : 07thFebruary, 2024
None Present.
The above numbered Civil Revision
Application No.744 of 2023 is listed on the
board of Registrar third time. Already, four
weeks time has been granted, however, despite granting four weeks time, the office objections are not removed.
Here reference to Chapter V of the Bombay
High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (for short “Rules”) may be conveniently made.
It states about procedure after presentation, removal of office objections etc.
In view of provisions under Chapter V, Rule
3(ii), the Advocates/Parties are expected to remove the office objections within 14 days from the date of notification.
Rule (5) further provides that, if the office
objections are not removed asprovided

under Rule 3, the office shall place the matter before the Registrar, who shall refuse the registration of such all matters. The prescribed time to remove the office objections provided under Rule 1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to non removal of office objections. However, instead of passing order of refusal of registration outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to remove the office objections. In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to remove the office objections without fail. On failure, registration would stand refused, without further reference to the Court of Registrar. No further extension will be granted. sd/Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm