The High Court at Bombay disposed of the Civil Revision Application as infructuous following the withdrawal of the principal suit, RCS No. 531/2020, by the Joint Civil Judge, Malshiras.
CRA disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P4. CRA-45-2022.docx
Amberkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2022
Dadasaheb Shivram Tamhane & Anr. .. Applicants Versus Abhilasha Sanjay Jagtap & Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2024
P. C.:
1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
2. Perused the praecipe dated 10.09.2024.
3. Heard Mr. Jadhav, learned Advocate for Applicants.
4. Mr. Jadhav would submit that since the principal Suit i.e. RCS No. 531/2020 has been withdrawn on 09.02.2024, present Civil Revision Application (CRA) has become infructuous. He has placed before this Court the order of withdrawal passed below Exh. 1 dated 09.02.2024 by the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Malshiras, District Solapur.
5. In view of the above, CRA is disposed as infructuous.
Amberkar
Digitally signed by RAVINDRA RAVINDRAMOHANAMBERKAR MOHANAMBERKARDate:2024.09.10 14:29:31 +0530
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Application becomes infructuous upon withdrawal of the principal suit.
Dadasaheb Shivram Tamhane & Anr.
Abhilasha Sanjay Jagtap & Ors.
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
