Note to issue notice to respondents in a Civil Revision Application regarding a suit challenging a 1993 sale deed on fraud grounds; notice to return on 27th Jan 2025.
Notice issued to respondents; CR.A. to be decided finally at admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-CRA.191.2024.odt
Tauseef
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.191 OF 2024
Anandraj Radhakishan Jaiswal, through his Poa Holder Mr. Pankajkumar Anandraj Jaiswal ...Applicant Versus Laxman Gangaram Aglawe & Ors. …Respondents _____________________________________________________
Adv. Anand P. Bhandari for Applicant.
Adv. A. S. Bajaj a/w. Mr. Mohit Malpani for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 16th DECEMBER 2024.
P.C.:-
and Mr. A. S. Bajaj, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1-Caveator.
1 of 2
Tauseef
16-CRA.191.2024.odt
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
2 of 2
Anandraj Radhakishan Jaiswal
Laxman Gangaram Aglawe
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
