Civil revision application dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the applicants on multiple dates, including the date of hearing. Counsel for respondent no.2 sought discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-CRA-115-2007.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.115 OF 2007
Industrial Trading Agencies and Ors. … Applicants V/s.
Premavati G. Gupta and Anr. … Respondents
None for the Applicants.
Ms. Huzan Bhumgara i/by Desai & Diwanji, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 27 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.:
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Sharada
Industrial Trading Agencies and Ors.
Premavati G. Gupta
Anr.
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
