Contempt petition disposed of after respondents' counsel produced a notice dated 11.3.2024 showing the Member Secretary had complied with the court's directions by disposing of proceedings within the stipulated time. Petitioner claimed non-receipt of notice; liberty to take recourse to that notice was kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-GOA:964
CPM 3 of 2024
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CONTEMPT PETITION (MAIN) NO.3 OF 2024
DEEPAK GRACIAS
... PETITIONER
Versus
SHAIKH ALI AHMED AND ANR
... RESPONDENTS
Mr N. Costafrias and Mr R. Panchal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED :- 21st June, 2024
P.C.
Mr Bhobe learned counsel appearing for the respondent hands in a copy of the notice dated 11.3.2024 addressed to the petitioner thereby informing that Member Secretary has already disposed of the proceedings before it, as per directions of this Court within stipulated time.
Page 1 of 2
21st June, 2024
CPM 3 of 2024
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Signed by: VINITA VIKAS NAIK Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 21/06/2024 17:18:34
Page 2 of 2
21st June, 2024
Deepak Gracias
Shaikh Ali Ahmed
Anr
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
