Ganpat Shrihari Dhumak v. Vijay Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition in a writ matter listed for further consideration. Petitioner's advocate was absent despite circulation being granted. The court adjourned the matter to a later date and directed it not to be circulated before then.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
928cp985.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 CONT. PETITION NO. 985 OF 2024 IN WP/3924/2024
GANPAT SHRIHARI DHUMAK VERSUS
VIAY KUMAR J
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.V.Kotecha
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & R. W. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 26.11.2024.
PER COURT :
- Inspite of granting circulation, learned Advocate for the petitioner is absent.
- Place the matter for further consideration on 07.01.2025.
- Not to be circulated prior to the above date.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganpat Shrihari Dhumak
- respondent
Viay Kumar J
Coram
VIBHA KANKANWADI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sandipkumar C. More Abasaheb D. Shinde
- Order 2 · Sandipkumar C. More Abasaheb D. Shinde
- Order 3 · Sandipkumar C. More Abasaheb D. Shinde
- Order 4 · Sandipkumar C. More Abasaheb D. Shinde
- Order 5 · Sandipkumar C. More Abasaheb D. Shinde
- Order 6 · Sandipkumar C. More Abasaheb D. Shinde
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court