Disposed
Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal v. Shri Asheemkumar Gupta
Bombay HCCP/214/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:9915-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
999 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 214 OF 2024 IN WP/12271/2019
OMPRAKASH SITARAM AGRAWAL VERSUS
SHRI ASHEEMKUMAR GUPTA
Advocate for petitioner : Mr. A.P. Bhandari AGP for the respondent – State : Mr. A.D. Wange
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 08 MAY 2024
PC :
Both the sides are unanimous that order of this Court has
been complied with by issuing notification under sub-section (2) of section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
Ompakash Sitaram Agrawal
Shri Asheemkumar Gupta
Mangesh S. Patil
Shailesh P. Brahme
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court