In this contempt petition, the respondents' counsel assured compliance within specified timelines. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition without further orders.
None; petition disposed of upon undertaking by respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP 11 of 2024
Sonam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.11 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.710 OF 2023
NAKUL ATMA CHODANKAR ALIAS NAKUL
ATMA TARI
... PETITIONER
Versus
ZAIDEV R ALDONKAR AND 2 OTHERS
... RESPONDENTS
Mr P. Lotlikar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr Devidas Pangam, Advocate General with Mr Shubham Priolkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr B. Fatarpekar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM:- M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI MENEZES, JJ.
DATED :- 27th March, 2024
P.C.:
Page 1 of 2
27th March, 2024
CP 11 of 2024
panchayat's decision to the Petitioner.
VALMIKI MENEZES, J.
M. S. SONAK, J.
Page 2 of 2
27th March, 2024
Nakul Atma Chodankar Alias Nakul Atma Tari
Zaidev R Aldonkar and 2 others
M. S. Sonak
Valmiki Menezes
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
